Candidates Schimel and Crawford Make Last Appeals Ahead of Wisconsin Supreme Court Election

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates Brad Schimel and Susan Crawford make final pitches before election day. Schimel encourages Trump supporters to vote, claiming high turnout is vital for his success. Crawford criticizes Schimel’s ties to Elon Musk and emphasizes the importance of checks on wealth in politics. Election integrity remains a top concern amidst legislative challenges.

In the final hours leading up to Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election, candidate Brad Schimel has urged Donald Trump supporters to mobilize for voter turnout, emphasizing the importance of conservative participation. “It’s a turnout race,” he stated on WISN’s “UpFront.” Schimel is appealing directly to the Trump voter base to ensure his victory in the upcoming election. He believes that if 60% of Trump voters turn out, his chances of winning improve significantly.

In a recent interview, Schimel mentioned interactions with both Trump and Elon Musk, indicating he was excited to receive Trump’s endorsement. During his recounting, he noted, “He said, ‘Hello, Brad, it’s your favorite president,’” before discussing activist judges, which aligns with Schimel’s campaign messaging. However, he expressed uncertainty about Musk’s financial contributions related to anti-activist judge petitions, stating, “I frankly have thought about, should I sign that petition?”

Meanwhile, Susan Crawford, the liberal candidate, is criticizing Schimel’s association with Musk, urging Democratic voters to recognize the unprecedented influence of wealth in the election. “This is really unprecedented, to have the richest man in the world weighing into a state Supreme Court race and spend that kind of money,” Crawford commented. She highlighted the necessity for voter awareness regarding the broader implications of their choices.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has also emphasized the significance of this election, noting the gerrymandering of Wisconsin’s congressional maps and advocating for Crawford as a capable candidate. Responding to claims about the court’s political leaning, Crawford affirmed her commitment to impartiality, stating, “Any case that comes in front of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, I’ll make a decision at the appropriate time after I know what the facts are.”

As Election Day approaches, Wisconsin’s top elections official, Meagan Wolfe, addressed concerns regarding Musk’s influence on voter behavior and reaffirmed the integrity of the election process. Wolfe stated that complaints about voter irregularities must adhere to specific legal protocols. She underscored that only U.S. citizens are allowed to vote in Wisconsin, as stipulated by state law.

Wolfe expressed her focus on administering the upcoming election, noting that recent changes, such as Trump’s executive order regarding voter registration, would not affect this election. The Wisconsin Supreme Court confirmed Wolfe’s position despite challenges to her reappointment, allowing her to concentrate on ensuring a successful election.

Paulina Gutierrez of the Milwaukee Election Commission highlighted the anticipated processing time for absentee ballots, indicating that it may take until midnight following the election to complete the tally. She noted legislative difficulties in modifying ballot processing rules that currently prevent early processing. Gutierrez emphasized the city’s commitment to operational excellence and the implementation of new safeguards to avoid past voting issues, ensuring accountability and transparency in the electoral process.

In conclusion, as the Wisconsin Supreme Court election approaches, both candidates, Brad Schimel and Susan Crawford, are making their final appeals to voters. Schimel focuses on driving conservative turnout with the backing of high-profile endorsements, while Crawford aims to educate voters on the implications of wealth’s role in politics. With the integrity of the electoral process under scrutiny and challenges from both sides, the outcome of the election holds significant consequences for the state’s judicial landscape.

Original Source: www.wispolitics.com