Loading Now

Trump Claims Credit for Congo-Rwanda Peace Deal, Complains About Nobel Prize Snub

A serene landscape showcasing peace between nations with lush green fields and a clear blue sky.

President Trump claims credit for a peace deal between Congo and Rwanda, heralding it as a significant achievement. However, he quickly shifts focus to express frustration over not receiving a Nobel Peace Prize for his diplomatic efforts. Despite his claims of multiple peacemaking accomplishments, many remain unverified or disputed. The article highlights the tension between Trump’s self-image and reality in international relations.

On June 20, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump celebrated what he claimed to be a significant diplomatic achievement: the peace deal between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda. Speaking to the press at Morristown Municipal Airport, he heralded the agreement as a “Great Day for Africa and, quite frankly, a Great Day for the World.” However, his excitement was quickly overshadowed by his lamentations about not receiving a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts.

The peace deal was officially announced on June 18 during a joint statement by the two nations, stating they had reached an agreement in Washington to end hostilities in eastern Congo. This accord is reportedly set to be signed in the U.S. capital next week, although Trump asserted it would occur on Monday—contradicting the countries’ announcement of a June 27 signing date.

After touting the DRC-Rwanda agreement, Trump expressed dissatisfaction over the Nobel Committee’s failure to recognize his contributions to global peace. “I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do,” he asserted. He went on to list other peace efforts he believes he facilitated, including those between India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and maintaining stability between Egypt and Ethiopia.

In his typical manner, Trump revisited his complaints about being snubbed by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. He alluded to various conflicts, stating, “No, I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be.” He concluded his thoughts by emphasizing how public recognition counts for him: “but the people know, and that’s all that matters to me!”

Though the DRC-Rwanda deal signifies a diplomatic milestone, it is essential to question the credibility of Trump’s assertions regarding his peacemaking prowess. His claims of facilitating efforts with India and Pakistan have been rebuffed by Indian officials, indicating a discrepancy between his narrative and actual diplomatic history. Trump’s tenure has been characterized by promises of swift resolutions to ongoing conflicts, yet several remain unresolved five months into his presidency.

Notably, Trump often highlights his multiple nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize from various supporters, a fact he seems to enjoy reiterating. This raises the question of whether his self-acclaimed role as a peacemaker aligns with objective measures of peace efforts and diplomatic success.

In summary, while Trump celebrates the DRC-Rwanda peace deal as a crowning diplomatic success, his complaints about not receiving a Nobel Peace Prize overshadow the achievement. His assertions about various peace efforts, often disputed, and his ongoing grievances with the Nobel Committee raise doubts about the validity of his self-proclaimed peacemaker title. As his presidency continues, it remains evident that many conflicts remain unresolved despite his claims of progress.

Original Source: www.wionews.com

Ethan Kim is an award-winning journalist specializing in social issues and technology impact. He received his degree from Stanford University and has over 12 years of reporting experience. Ethan's work combines meticulous research with engaging narratives that inform and inspire action. His dedication to covering stories that often go unnoticed has made him a respected figure in journalism, contributing to greater awareness and understanding of the complex relationships between technology and society.

Post Comment