US and Argentina: Motivations Behind WHO Withdrawal Plans

The United States and Argentina announced intentions to withdraw from the WHO. Concerns include perceived bias towards China and inadequate management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Both nations seek more effective health governance and independence from political influences, signifying a critical reevaluation of international health affiliations.

On January 20, 2017, the United States, under the Trump administration, announced its intention to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), citing concerns over the organization’s perceived bias towards China. The administration criticized the WHO for allegedly downplaying the seriousness of the COVID-19 pandemic and delaying its declaration of a global health emergency. Furthermore, the U.S. government expressed dissatisfaction with the allocation of its financial contributions to the WHO, believing they were not effectively utilized.

Following six months of discussions, the Biden administration decided to reverse the withdrawal plan. Despite this, Trump continues to critique the WHO and maintains his original position. The situation was compounded when Argentina, influenced by its President Javier Milei, declared the country’s intention to withdraw from the organization on February 5, 2023. Milei’s spokesperson cited “deep differences” regarding the WHO’s management of health crises, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Additionally, Argentina raised concerns over the WHO’s lack of independence from political influences of other states, echoing sentiments similar to those expressed by the Trump administration. These developments highlight significant political divides and dissatisfaction with global health governance frameworks. Both nations stress the need for autonomy and effective management of health policies, re-evaluating their commitments to international organizations.

The conversation surrounding the withdrawal of the United States and Argentina from the World Health Organization is rooted in broader concerns about global health governance amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The initial withdrawal announcement by the U.S. underscored tensions with China and dissatisfaction with the WHO’s decision-making process. Likewise, Argentina’s recent declaration signals a growing trend among nations reconsidering their affiliations with international health bodies amidst concerns of influence and effectiveness.

In summary, both the United States and Argentina have expressed intentions to withdraw from the WHO, citing inadequate responsiveness to the COVID-19 pandemic and excessive political influence. The critique stems from a desire for more effective and independent health policies, questioning the handling of international health crises. This trend reflects a larger discourse on the functional efficacy of global health organizations in times of crisis.

Original Source: globalsouthworld.com