The Limitations of Airstrikes Against the Houthis in Yemen

U.S. officials plan targeted airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen to secure maritime routes. However, experts argue that air power alone will not suffice to defeat the group, as they have garnered significant resilience. Historical military insights suggest the necessity of ground forces for lasting success.

Recent discussions among U.S. officials revealed intentions to employ airstrikes against the Houthi militia in Yemen, aimed at curbing their attacks on maritime shipping in the Red Sea. The objective of these operations is to restore safe passage to vital shipping lanes leading to the Suez Canal. Michael Waltz, a former national security adviser, emphasized that it is ultimately the responsibility of the United States to ensure the reopening of these passages.

However, experts in Middle Eastern affairs caution that the Iran-backed Houthis present a formidable challenge. Historically, military engagements relying solely on air power have not yielded successful outcomes. Notably, significant shipping companies are wary of operating in the Red Sea; many have devised alternative routes, albeit at greater costs, to maintain their schedules.

James R. Holmes, a prominent military strategist, pointed out that even during the 1991 Gulf War, achieving victory necessitated ground forces in addition to air support. He suggests that defeating the Houthis may similarly demand an occupation to ensure long-term success and stability in the region.

The complexity of the situation regarding the Houthis in Yemen underscores the limitations of relying solely on airstrikes. While U.S. officials express intentions to restore safety for maritime commerce, historical precedence indicates that a more comprehensive approach, including ground intervention, may be necessary to effectively address this ongoing conflict.

Original Source: www.nytimes.com